User talk:Elephantboy221

June 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 18:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elephantboy221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not in anyway make the same edits as how Animalworlds314 did before, i was only asking to get User:BhagyaMani and User:Elmidae blocked for making bad disruptive edits, i should not be the one to be blocked but if i can prove that can make useful contributions instead, then it shall be. I am willing to not make any disruptive edits as said.

Decline reason:

As noted in your UTRS request, Confirmed to Tahrzan2105. Yamla (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We're not stupid. Acroterion ::(talk) 18:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But @Acroterion:, what do you mean? @BhagyaMani: and @Elmidae: are the ones to be blocked indefinitely for doing bad contributions. @Yamla:, this is all a scam. They are the bad editors, you can't do this to me. -- Elephantboy221 (talk) 18:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a scam. The technical evidence is entirely unambiguous, you are behind Tahrzan2105. --Yamla (talk) 19:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage access revoked for abuse. Acroterion (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]