User talk:Elgin222

Reply[edit]

Hey. The info is actually quite controversial and a better source is definitely needed. Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Uwo222 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elgin222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet or have another account! I've been making legal and constructional edits in accordance with wikipedia policies since the beginning. I have no idea who "uwo222" is. And that account isn't even functional from what it seems like. Please review my ban and I request it be lifted. Look at my editing history. I have no bias towards any issues, I've added just as many muslim/islamic claims as hindu claim. I have no religious affiliation/bias or ethnic affiliation/bias. Please look at my editing history completely. It's neutral. Also, I edit from a centre which many people access and use for surfing the web. Please review everything again. Thank you. Sincerely, Elgin222 (talk) 23:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I found the claims made at the SPI convincing evidence of sockpuppetry, and if that's proven, that's all that matters no matter how nice and productive your edits are. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.