User talk:ElizabethOgunsuyi/sandbox
Contributions to the Christine Quinn Article:
1. Expand upon her gay activism advocating for gay rights 2. Expand upon her work with W.I.N. (Women in Need) as the CEO 3. Detailed descriptions of her campaign runs 4. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/nyregion/christine-quinn-win.html 5. https://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/christine-quinn 6. More information about her memoir and why it failed — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElizabethOgunsuyi (talk • contribs) 23:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Contributions to the following article: "Running Start: Bringing Young Women to Politics"
My objective is to provide clarifications to the article from a first hand perspective having worked as a Running Start Intern in 2016.
-Before jumping into an "overview" section, a history section should be provided detailing the organization's founding by Susannah Wellford under the WUFPAC. -The terminology of "Campaign College" is outdated for it has since been changed to "Elect Her" which is the training program provided by Running Start to advise young women in their student government pursuits. -The Women to Watch Awards is actually the Young Women to Watch Awards and, in recent years, has been held at the National Museum of Women in the Arts rather than the National Press Club. -Can include a section of similar organizations that also collaborate with Running Start like She Should Run and American Association of University Women. -The article lacks a picture. I believe Running Start's logo would suffice. -At the end of the article, pictures of the organization's old office building and new one can be included. ] -Include personal backgrounds of the staff: Susannah Wellford (Founder), Melissa Richmond (Vice President), and Sara Blanco (Operations Manager). -Testimonials of participants of YWPL, for example, would be a great addition attesting to the organization's success and impact. -A few links do not work/are irrelevant.
ElizabethOgunsuyi (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Elizabeth
ElizabethOgunsuyi (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Elizabeth
Peer Review Session 3/10
[edit]I think for yours it might be helpful to define some of the more difficult terms such as "slush fund" and possibly link it to an existing wikipedia article if one exists? Also, it seems that with a political article like this its hard not to sound opinionated almost. Were you instructed to refrain from the use of like news articles? I know that we were but I feel like it might be useful to use them for like political writing. I know some NY times articles/editorials are referenced which might be biased. Celsisa (talk) 21:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)