User talk:ElliotNestor

This user is a student editor in University_of_Washington/Technical_Writing_and_Communication_in_Chemical_Engineering_(Winter) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ElliotNestor, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Montano's peer review of Polymer chemistry article[edit]

This article is very elaborate and extensive. The intro paragraph and the “polymers and their properties” sections are very well written, and I wouldn’t mess with them too much.

I also wouldn’t do too much with the “classifications” section, but it could be cleaned up a little. Perhaps, a list of bullet points for each classification would make it easier to navigate.

Perhaps a place to improve this article is by adding a section about types of reactions, I know peptide synthesis and Merrifield resins are useful reactions and sub straits (respectively) that deal with polymer chemistry. Maybe discuss the predominant industrial uses of polymer chemistry. Some of the pictures seem a little redundant.

Other than that I think this is an extremely well developed article.

Good luck!

Jeffrey Montano (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Jeffrey Montano[reply]

I agree the intro is good enough, but I don't think the article is really that extensive. The classifications section only has bio/synthetic and composites, which isn't really a classification but a use for polymers, especially from a chemical sense. There are other ways to classify polymers that are not present. I have included a section for techniques, but I feel industry uses would fall more underneath polymer engineering. I haven't addressed the pictures, but that might be the next place to deal with.ElliotNestor (talk) 06:51, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]