User talk:Eluminary

Welcome!

Hi, Eluminary. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. C759 (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maya civilization

Hi Eluminary,

Thanks for your edit to Maya civilization - unfortunately the information is no longer current and I undid your edit. Such terms as "Old Empire" and "New Empire" have fallen into disuse, they were first suggested before Maya script had been deciphered, on the assumption that the Maya had politically unified empires. In the past two decades great advances have been made in deciphering Maya script and the chronology has been rewritten. It is now known that the Maya were never unified politically and instead were divided into competitive city-states. Maya chronology is now divided into Preclassic (Early, Middle and Late), Classic (Early and Late) and Postclassic (Early and Late). More detail on this can be found at Mesoamerican chronology. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Little Chapel That Stood

The article The Little Chapel That Stood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable watercolor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Little Chapel That Stood

Hello, Eluminary,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Little Chapel That Stood should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Chapel That Stood .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, AMLNet49-Talk-Cont 05:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Bank number

An article that you have been involved in editing—Bank number—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ★BrandonALF★ ^talk ^edits 02:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]