User talk:Embassy of France

Many people come to edit Wikipedia with mistaken ideas as to the nature of Wikipedia, and in perfectly good faith do things which are not in line with Wikipedia policies, and unfortunately you seem to have done so. Both your editing history and your username indicate that the account represents an organisation or group or a web site, which is against Wikipedia policy, as an account must be for just one person. In addition, your editing makes it clear that your purpose is to make Wikipedia coverage conform to the wishes of your organisation, but Wikipedia is not a medium for any person or organisation to promote the view of themselves that they wish to be known; Wikipedia seeks to report how a subject is shown in independent, third party, reliable published sources. As for your statement that you were removing content "due to the unauthorized released [sic] of personal names and informations [sic]" you do not have authority to grant or to deny authorisation for Wikipedia to report what has been published. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Before making any unblock request, you should read the guide to appealing blocks. JBW (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Embassy of France (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand your message and didn't know how your policies were working. I've been acting in good faith without hiding the name of my Embassy. The controversy section was mentionning names and reasons that were not documented in the reference attached and could harm the people involved, accused of racism. The jugement doesn't mention for example Kareen Rispal, our current Ambassador to Canada, neither some details mentionned on the article. I do not intend to delete the mention of the controversy and understand this section, but I would like to be unblock to suggest some legitimate edits about not referenced or source information in the article about the Embassy of France. Embassy of France (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No thanks. If you wish to be unblocked, please read WP:USERNAME, WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:NPOV, and tell us specifically how you would adhere to those policies. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.