User talk:Ems1960/Nitro cold brew coffee

I really enjoyed the new sections you added to the article. It makes the article very clear, and provides a lot more information about nitro cold brew coffee. Also, the article is now much more organized and easy to read. In the "History" section you mentioned about Starbucks and The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf introducing the beverage, and I think that you can add on to how nitro cold brew became popular in the recent years (or maybe even adding another section explaining this). It will also be nice if you can add some images of the beverage, because it gives a visual image of what nitro brew actually looks like. Angelsu52 (talk) 15:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Com 482 Peer Review

Hi, I really enjoyed your article and I think you did some good changes to it. I like how you organized the article. The title of every part clearly informed people about the content on each section and make it easier to find information. Also, I saw you added a lot of detail to the article, which makes the article more complete and understandable. The content you included is great and I don't see any changes that could improve it. However, it will be better if some images about Nitro cold brew coffee could be added to it. For example, pictures of the coffee or the production process. Moreover, I think you could dig deeper into it, what kind of coffee bean is the best to make Nitro cold brew coffee? Is there any story behind it (who invented this coffee and How the nitro cold brew coffee evolved these years.) I hope my suggestion could be useful.LinearBicycle (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Good job! I like that you added a picture, as it is a relatively new beverage on the market, it is great for the unfamiliar drinker(?). I think your lead could introduce a bit of history and nutritional info just to make sure that your intro has bits of info of what is to come. You have a solid introduction of what the drink is in the lead which is great. I think you did a nice job incorporating new information into what was already in the article. It's nice that you mentioned where the beverage was sold so someone curious can pinpoint where to get the beverage right from the Wiki page! The article has a strong list of sources which is good. I think it might be interesting to include the reception of the drink. It's popular but how popular? If that information is available that could be interesting (is it a top beverage for Starbucks?). Maybe you could compare it to other coffee beverages such as a latte, americano and distinguish the process/experience to give people a bit more background? Kingleothethird (talk) 06:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)