User talk:Encyclo Enthusiast

Welcome!

Hi Encyclo Enthusiast! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that you recently removed content from Supreme leader without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discuss this on the article's talk page to seek consensus. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 15:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 16:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I made the necessary and correct editing. You guys don't check the sources before accepting anything. You think everything to be undisputable truth if it is targeting conservative or right wing ideology. Please stop your prejudice and bias. If you have sources refuting my claim then do it, else who gives you the right to refute what I have written? Encyclo Enthusiast (talk) 07:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. The edits you made were also not followed with any credible evidence or citation which only shows your bias and ignorance. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted back to the edit which is grammatically and factually correct. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you Encyclo Enthusiast (talk) 07:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. - SUN EYE 1 09:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SUN EYE 1 09:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I just want to know the credibility of the information that is there. There is no citation or any link that supports the utterly biased piece that's there. Either you clarify that Wikipedia is a staunch Left liberal platform which will indulge in spewing venom against right wing, capitalist, conservative ideology or take action against all such personal analysis/synthesis which also target right wing ideological pages. You are absolutely biased, ignorant, prejudiced, ill informed to have taken an absolutely unjustified action against my edit. May god give you some brains to figure out your wrong (oh sorry you wouldn't be believing in god, would you?) Encyclo Enthusiast (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]