User talk:Erennica

May 2021

Your recent editing history at Talk:Turkish War of Independence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. YODADICAE👽 15:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages serve as a record of conversation. Users should not remove others' comments from a talk page. User may remove their own comments; however, it is bad practice to do so once they've been replied to, because it distorts the record of the conversation.

For these reasons, I've restored your original edit request to the talk page in question, but I've removed your follow-on, since nobody replied to that. —C.Fred (talk) 16:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have obtained consent from the other editor to withdraw the entire thread.[1] —C.Fred (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred Thanks. Erennica (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Erennica reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: ). Thank you. YODADICAE👽 15:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi Erennica! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

See also MOS:TERRORIST, which the previous lead is fully compliant with. FDW777 (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Again, see MOS:TERRORIST. FDW777 (talk) 15:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turkisn War of Independence

If you have specific errors to tell us about, you may do so. We cannot respond to a general complaint. If the sources in the article are not being summarized accurately, please go to the article talk page and detail the nature of the errors. You may also offer your own independent reliable sources that may be missing. If you don't like what the sources say, you will need to take that up with them. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.V. E. (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring behaviour

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --V. E. (talk) 20:06, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: if a user removes a message or warning from their user talk page, they are deemed to have read it. Do not restore the message (but do feel free to refer to the diff of removal if you have to escalate the concern to a noticeboard). —C.Fred (talk) 20:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]