User talk:Eve46467

Your reversion of a minor edit

You reverted a minor edit (providing a wikilink for an author) here, requesting that I discuss on the talk page first. Why is this necessary in this case? Dsp13 (talk) 09:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

You have made other similar unhelpful edits, e.g. reverting the rescuing of a source. If there is a particular substantive issue needing to be discussed, please by all means recommend talk page discussion - but in that case it is helpful for you to open that talk page discussion yourself to explain why you think an edit needs discussion. Simply reverting all edits with a call for talk page discussion is disruptive. Dsp13 (talk) 09:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@Dsp13: I've just been reverted with a near-same edit summary here for no reason. Not sure what this editor is getting out of it.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 09:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. I'm not sure why you appear to be conducting a number of unsubstantiated reverts on medical articles with an identical edit summary of "If you would like to edit something please discuss in the talk page", often only a few minutes apart on each edit, but please stop. Unconstructive editors who are WP:NOTHERE to build the encyclopedia are blocked; either cease these edits or face the consequences.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 09:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sdrqaz (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)