User talk:Evolutionselene

To User:Apostrophe

I do not know what your issue is with me but you need to quit it! As for Ward3001, thanks for all the revisions.Evolutionselene 16:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pai Mei.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pai Mei.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Michael Corvin.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Corvin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Michael Corvin.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Michael Corvin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Michael Corvin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Michael Corvin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Erika 0001.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Erika 0001.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Erika 0001.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Erika 0001.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this some kind of vendetta you have against me?! I've seen you people justify keeping the Chris Crocker article despite the FACT that you people are feeding his need to be an attention whore yet your NOT allowing me to use images without some rationale? Why does wikipedia even bother allowing users to edit articles? Fan sites use images all the time without permission from the person they are making the site for and all the images. I personally know someone who made a fansite for a celebrity they like yet I don't see anyone jumping down their throats for rationaling them for their image sources. Also why have you not banhammered Apostrophe for deleting entire articles yet I AM the one who is being singled out for a few pics I made from my PC programs on my own?! I mean what the hell man! I spend hours on this crap and to see it being trashed for no good reason is complete bull! Evolutionselene 18:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and since when is it that someone is blocked from even editing their OWN user page?!Evolutionselene 19:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All blocks prevent you from editing your user page, though not your discussion page. As to Chris Crocker, I have no idea what you are talking about. I've never heard of that person. Nor am I aware of having any dealings with Apostrophe, though I may have done. And the problem with the pictures is that you did not create them. You simply generated screenshots from movies, or some such. That does not grant you ownership of the images. I am sorry you are not willing to abide by WP:IUP but I assure you this is required. Wikipedia is much more careful about copyright and fair-use than most fansites and we require that any image you upload meets our image-use policy. --Yamla 19:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no lick of sense whatso ever. I did create the pics. The pics were non existant until I've created them with the programs. And you SHOULD be aware of Apostrophe. I've seen his talk page and it's riddled with complaints from others about him deleting articles without so much discussion. He's a known Edit Warer and multiple violator of the 3RR. He's done far worse then simply uoploading a few quote and quote unsourced quote and quote pics. He's been straight out vandalising this site. And that IS silly that I'm blocked from even editing my OWN page. I feel like I wasted my time here because YOU PEOPLE are giving me hell over a few pics yet others are doing FAR worse then me. I really DO think you have a beef with me or else you'd of not even care to bother. Evolutionselene 19:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously claiming that you created Image:Michael Corvin.jpg, for example? It looks like a film screenshot to me. As such, the copyright rests with the company who made the film. Taking a screenshot does not confer ownership of the image to you. As to Apostrophe, please note that there are over two million articles here and some massive number of registered users. I monitor a tiny subset of these. If you believe another user is vandalising Wikipedia, please report them to WP:AIV. This is not an excuse for you to ignore our policies and guidelines. --Yamla 20:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am Not claiming, it was a fact!. Anyway it doesn't matter now. I'm done with this site. I'm sick and tired of putting in the man hours into this site which I could of put to much better use. This site is nothing more then a place which suckers people into making this site from free labor. Real sites pay people to do this. Further more, the owner of this site could get sued for misinformation which is far worse then what I've done. You people really need to examine your priotiries and your so-called policies. I'll look at this site but as far as doing FURTHER edits, I'm done. Evolutionselene 20:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael Corvin.jpg is a screenshot from a film. You have already all but admitted this when you said you generated it using PowerDVD. As such, your claim that you created this image is false, though I am sure you took the screenshot. As I have already pointed out, though, creating a screenshot does not confer ownership of the image to you. Finally, I will warn you about legal threats. Please see WP:NLT. You are certainly not obligated to contribute to the Wikipedia, however. --Yamla 20:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all you can delete all my pics I've uploaded on this site because I could care less so the pics are not an issue to me anymore as far as I am concerned. And It's not a threat because I'm not threatening to do a thing to this site. It's the celebrities you have an article you have to worry about. On a daily basis people put misinformation on this site. That is subject for suing. There are people who get sued for slander everyday. Anyway, its not my problem anymore. Have a nice day. Evolutionselene 21:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Corvin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Corvin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Kill Bill Group

Template:Infobox Kill Bill Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 08:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Erika (Underworld)

I have nominated Erika (Underworld), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika (Underworld). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 14:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Kill Bill character

Template:Kill Bill character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slavitza Jovan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slavitza Jovan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slavitza Jovan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]