User talk:Ezalb

Edits to Kent Hovind

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Flyguy649 05:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flyguy649 06:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Kent Hovind. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade 06:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have suggestions for the Kent Hovind article, you are strongly encouraged to discuss them on the talk page rather than editing as you are now. Your current edits may be seen as disruptive and result in a block, as will violating the three-revert rule, which you are near to doing if you haven't already. Seraphimblade 06:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported to administrators for violating the three-revert rule after multiple warnings to cease disruption and discuss your edits. Please take more care to discuss your edits in the future. Seraphimblade 06:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 07:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]