User talk:Ezhava

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Vaikom Satyagraha. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove content which is referenced

Hello anonymous person, my edit was quite intentional. I was not experimenting. Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia, but I am not a newcomer. I have been observing your edits, along with those of the anonymous person at Coventry University, for some time. If you are serious about your point of view, kindly create an identity for yourself instead of hiding behind anonymous IP address.

Your principal reference is from Krishna Ananth in the Hindu newspaper. However, he is not fully aware of the facts, and is prone to exaggeration about the roles of Tamils, being a Tamil himself.

There are many other citations that show little or no role for Naicker in the Vaikom struggle, considering it was in Travancore, which was not under the Madras Presidency. The struggle was led by local Malayalis, who were quite politically aware then as now.

Kindly do not let your respect for Naicker lead to excessive exaggeration of his importance to those in other parts of the country. Kerala is not an appendage to Tamil Nadu, and the Dravidian politics of Tamil Nadu has no resonance in Kerala.

Do not manipulate information

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sister Abhaya murder case was not a religiously motivated violence. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing deliberate factual errors warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Read the article on Religious violence. Then come to edit the page. That murder case was a criminal incident, a rape incident, that was not Religious violence. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

You have violated three revert rule. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for WP:3RR violation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

ANTI-CHRISTIAN VIOLENCE

I find that the Article on Anti-Christian Violence is full of POV. Jobxavier (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]