User talk:F.Moshammad/sandbox
Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Mtrowers |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/14/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/14/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/14/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | concise |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate for I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | Nice |
Grammar & composition | Correct |
Other comments | Nice Job! |
Mtrowers (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Edit #1 Pre-edit review
[edit]Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin
Date of review: 5/15/2013
Name of editor: Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length of edit wasn’t too long but was short and simple
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes used textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes I/O Psych is adherent
Wikiformatting: Good Formatting
Grammar & composition: Good grammar & composition
Other comments: Bulletin points were a good choice!
Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Ant_N_York |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/14/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/14/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/14/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate for I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | Good |
Grammar & composition | Good |
Other comments | Good Job! |
Ant N York (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-edit reviews Edit # 1
[edit]Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/13/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/13/13 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 05/13/13 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length of edit |
Image (needed/appropriate) | n/a |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Textbook info accurate |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate for I/O Psych |
Wikiformatting | Good Format |
Grammar & composition | Good grammar & compostition |
Other comments | Good edit! |
[[Angela Sandy (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer: Hmehta0120
Date of review: 4/24/2013
Name of editor: F. Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 4/24/2013
Date review submitted to instructor: 4/24/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short): I find it pretty lengthy but then again, you are discussing two different type of test the Interest test and Aptitude test.
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A (read comment in comment section)
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit):Very much accurate to the textbook information and got the most important parts out from them.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed:N/A---textbook base
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): N/A---textbook base
Wikiformatting: Very well for matting.
Grammar & composition: Well put together and stated. Didn’t find any mishaps
Other comments: Seem great to me, great idea to add test base to the article. The length of it seems well enough to support information to both tests. Only advice is try to see if you could become creative with it (such as bullet points and etc). Side note if you do add an image to the page such as someone taking the test from clip art, or example of one of your test would add more character to the page.
Hmehta0120 (talk) 03:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
F.Moshammad (talk) 03:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:Fernando18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of review | 5/1/2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia F.Moshammad | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/1/13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date review submitted to instructor | 5/1/13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Image (needed/appropriate) | need a image if possible | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Very accurate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Primary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Good article and topic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikiformatting | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grammar & composition | None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comments | Very informative
reviews for pre Edit # 2 Performance appraisals starts from here[edit]
Pre edit peer review[edit]
|