User talk:Falkreon

Boa Bom edits, 2010

why is to easy for someone to say (as differentSmoke, in this particular case) something and it being totally accepted without it being necessarily correct and accurate, therefore, causing a whole lot of problems for an association or whatever they are? i mean, it's funny how he says "After the big commotion, no one was incarcerated and the sung thru school faded away from media attention", and somewhere else he mentions rumors, things he heard..... if he nor what a judicial system can prove anything, why can his comments stay when all they do is be of slanderous nature? i am curious... i've noticed this in many, many instances around wikipedia..... though when there is a famous and prominent figure behind the article, any bad comment leaves without much of an argument or admin presence. i am someone that actually practiced this system in the past. bought the book, liked it just like i like my bikram yoga. went to both practices simultaneously and met all the teachers in the US, yet no one tried to abduct me or kidnap me. and for the record, the "greeting" that differentSmoke mentions "both hands joined at their thumbs and index finger forming a triangle" is a fairly standard way to position hands when you travel across the east. i think, in my opinion, this kid needs to see the world and get out of his silly ideas. i would love to see what would happen if he tried something like this with bikram yoga... he'd be so quickly sued and wiped! [The preceeding unsigned comment was from Nauma]

February 2011

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Tonywalton ^Talk 00:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)