User talk:Fancy Refrigerator

This is Fancy Refrigerator's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Seeking Guidance on Improving Draft Submission

Hello Fancy Refrigerator,

I noticed that you declined my submission for the draft article on BankSathi. I appreciate your feedback and would like to understand the specific reasons for the decline better.

If you could provide insights into the areas where the draft needs improvement, I would be grateful. I'm particularly interested in understanding how I can enhance the notability of the subject and ensure the article adheres to Wikipedia's content policies.

Thank you for your assistance!

Best regards, Jacky2024 Jacky2024 (talk) 08:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jacky2024. Your submission reads like an advertisement, and it remains so after your revision. I see that you have reached out to AfC help desk. Please note that “conflict of interest” refers to all, if any, relationship you have with the subject, which, in this case, is BankSathi. Are you compensated for any of your edits? If so, you need to refer to the paid contribution guideline. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salman abbas khaskheli

Hi there. When you tag a page for A7 as you did at Salman abbas khaskheli, could you please wait at least 10 minutes to an hour before nominating the page for speedy deletion? This is to give the creator time to potentially add a credible claim of significance and develop the article before deletion is considered. We don't want to end up biting a user, even if they are editing an article that they have a COI with, by tagging just after they started the page. If they do have a COI the article could be moved to draftspace or tagged as a G11 if it is unambiguously promotional. Does this make sense? Thanks, Fathoms Below (talk) 14:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fathoms Below. To my knowledge, a BLP in the mainspace can be speedily deleted if it does not show the notability of the subject person. This includes autobiographies. The page in question did not show notability, and, having looked at the previously deleted version of the page, I was not confident that it would meet CCS. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 18:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A7 is about CCS, not notability, which is a higher standard. As long as the article asserts a claim that apparently attributes noteworthiness to the subject and the claim is plausible (it doesn't need to have sources in the article backing it up) then it doesn't qualify for A7 and should be actioned with a different method, such as listing it at AfD. Writing a CCS isn't hard, and the creator might add one a few minutes after creation even if they didn't add it to the article immediately. An article without a CCS might still be notable too through sources found both online and offline, so although it might be eligible for A7, maybe that wouldn't be the best option to immediately tag. So yeah, maybe wait a few minutes to be cautious instead of tagging immediately in my opinion. Just in case. Fathoms Below (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]