User talk:FatimaOvida

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FatimaOvida (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am participating in a conversation with Jimmy Wales about a user's conduct, the conversation is still open and considered legitimate; the individual in question just made some misogynistic attacks on Jimbo's page and posted an inappropriate link to a picture of me so I was responding to him there, and had also made some racial and misogynistic attacks on me on a Wikipedia criticism website; the conversation with Jimmy Wales was considered valid, so I will keep it there, thank you --FatimaOvida (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm guessing you don't have an interest in philosophy, either. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 23:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]