User talk:Fazach

May 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Dover. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry, I tried to add what I thought was useful information, as I see is added in other instances of the same pages. I will not add back the links and will be extra careful If I think I should add new info or source to a page again. Apologies. Fazach (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

You know full well what you have been doing. Equine-man (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Sorrento, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Equine-man (talk) 10:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)