User talk:Fgtyg78

January 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. McSly (talk) 23:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This product represent an interest for big data. SL— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgtyg78 (talk • contribs)

Hundreds of companies have products in the big data field, that's no reason to include them in the article and Lablanche doesn't look special at all. In fact a few google searches [1] [2] [3] show that it is virtually unknown and certainly hasn't done anything justifying inclusion in the article. So without notability, there is no reason to add it in the article. --McSly (talk) 03:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Big data. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.
You appear to be editing under the IP address 90.50.49.149 as well as under this user. Please log in when you edit & stop placing promotional content in the lede of the article. Discuss posting any thing about Lablanche & Company in the Big data article. Peaceray (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Compressed sensing. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
• lablanche-and-co.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://xxx.lablanche-and-co.com
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As this account has been used solely to spam the project in conjunction with logged out editors, I've changed this block to indefinite after consulting with the blocking admin. You'll need to explictly address your behavior before an unblock will be considered. Kuru (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]