User talk:Fieari/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archiving[edit]

Revisiting Assurant[edit]

Hey Fieari, thanks for your comment on Assurant back in June. I'd been working with Timtempleton to make the suggested revisions to the article, but he recently became unresponsive. Would you mind taking a look? We had a lengthy discussion on it over on my talk page, and it feels like we got quite close to resolving the issue. Any feedback you have would be greatly appreciated!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I posted some more suggestions on the talk page for Assurant, but it hasn't been very active over there. If you've got a minute, would you mind taking a look at my proposed revisions?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Challenge Series[edit]

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Fieari. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting Watchfinder[edit]

Hi Fieari, thanks for your input on the Watchfinder deletion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Watchfinder_(2nd_nomination).

I am the digital marketing manager for the company, however I had no input on the original page and like the rest of the Wikipedians on the deletion notices I did feel it was a bit spammy, but until today I have had no experience in editing Wikipedia.

The page has no been recreated by another Wikipedian and I have made a couple of edits, however hopefully this time it is purely informational and not promotional. My hope is to work with you and the other Wikipedians to make sure that the article can remain as a valuable entry to the site rather than be deleted for being promotional again.

I do feel Watchfinder is at least as notable as any other watch retailer that has an article on Wikipedia; fox example as a business we are approximately 8 times the size of Bob's Watches the company mentioned in the deletion note by Koavf, having seen revenues of GBP £68m in our last financial year[1], we have produced the most watched Rolex video on YouTube[2][3] and have worked with the UK government to create Watchmaking apprenticeships program to aid the entire industry[4].

Would you be able to have a look at the recreated page and advise what could be improved upon.

Many thanks

Sean

References

  1. ^ "Watchfinder looking to expand following surge in sales". Jewellery Focus.
  2. ^ "Rolex Submariner Watchmaking Demonstration". YouTube.
  3. ^ "Tony Williams, head watchmaker, Watchfinder & co". Watchpro.
  4. ^ "HOT 100 TRAILBLAZERS: Matt Bowling & Tony Williams, director & head watchmaker, Watchfinder". Watchpro.

Deletion inquiry[edit]

Was wondering if you'd kindly be interested in assessing Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heap_(company) (since you participated in the Mixpanel deletion discussion). It seems users DGG and SwisterTwister routinely vote for deletion together without offering analysis, so I wanted to get a third-party involved. I'm not fishing for a keep, but I am looking for a legitimate discussion if possible. Thanks for any consideration. GDWin (talk) GDWin —Preceding undated comment added 22:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings[edit]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fieari. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Perverted-Justice.com/MediaRevision" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Perverted-Justice.com/MediaRevision. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 19#Perverted-Justice.com/MediaRevision until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 01:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created AfD discussion for Publius (publishing system)[edit]

I'm writing this because you voted on AfD for Publius (publishing system) ariticle previously. I tried to improve the article, bit since I could not find any more reliable sources, I proposed article deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publius (publishing system) (2nd nomination). Thank you. Anton.bersh (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

MJLTalk 06:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]