User talk:Firstindyan

The article gave no references, and does may meet the guidelines at WP:CORP (used to establish whether a company or organisation is worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia) due to it's limited inclusion in secondary sources. The deletion itself is because it would have required a fundamental rewrite to make it suitable, and if you believe (or any one else for that matter) that it does meet the above guidelines, then there is nothing to stop its recreation. Please also read WP:COI and WP:OR, as given you are associated with the subject, it is probably best to let someone else write the article. If you would like the deletion reviewed, please see WP:DR. Thanks. Additionally, welcome to Wikipedia. Ian¹³ /t 15:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you to go to ~~WP:DR~~ WP:DRV for a deletion review, or you could recreate the page being sure to cite sources and establish notability (the speedy tag won't be reinstated by default, but as with any article, a AfD may be called for, or will be speeded if another admin believes it is still appropriate). Also, please do not add " " (multiple spaces) before any paragraph as it breaks standard formatting. You can use ":" for an indent. Ian¹³ /t 17:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    ==Deletion review for Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela==

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Firstindyan (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 July 19

I have reverted your edit to this page because it damaged other review discussion. Please be more careful in the future. Sandstein 15:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela

A tag has been placed on Consumer Protection Council, Rourkela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 16:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]