User talk:Fkrugerx

Technisoft

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Technisoft, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. -- dhp1080 ^(u·t·c) 02:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Technisoft:

Your recent edit to Technisoft (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a shared IP address to add email addresses, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 03:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Technisoft

Hi Fkrugerx, please read our policies on software notability before writing articles on software: it's there to help you. Good luck editing! Any questions, ask me on my talk page! --SunStar Net^talk 00:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Entries "Service Manager","Report Manager","Technisoft"

Hi,

I'm after some guidance here ...

I added the subject entries as a new contributor. These entries are not spam. I do concede however that they relate to company and company product information.

"Service Manager" is one of the most widely respected service management software products in use worldwide. A Google search of "technisoft service manager" will return 1000+ hits. At what point does a company or company product become notable enough to allow it to have a Wikipedia entry?

"Microsoft Dynamics GP" is a competing software product that does have a Wikipedia entry ...

Regards.

Fkrugerx 00:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 00:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I've seen the afd that there is one this one. The reason I voted speedy delete was because I caught a copyright violation on at least one of the pages. Wikipedia can't take text directly from a website, and trust me, even if you own the website, it's much easier to rephrase it in your own words.

Anyway, the problem with the site at the moment is it doesn't appear to pass the WP:CORP or WP:WEB guidelines. I would read up on those, and find how your piece of software fits those guidelines, and ASAP bring mention of that into the afd discussion. And if MS Dynamics GP is no more notable than your software, you could mention that too; but you'll need proofs for all of this. Finally, if it does pass, rephrase the words so it's no longer a copy of what's on the website, or it might then be deleted anyway. I hope this helps. Patstuart^talk|edits 13:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)