User talk:FloSch

Thank you for working on the English verions of the Marienplatz (Station) article. I fixed the odd error that a German speaker might make (Oktober/October), and put in a cross link to the Railway station layout page that all thorough German types like to put in. Marienplatz (Station) is a most interesting station.

Tabletop 13:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I missed those mistakes while correcting many others :) Do you have pictures of the Sydney station? There are unfortunately no pictures in the corresponding article. --FloSch 15:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just at this point of time I have no pictures of same to add. )-:

Heterologue

Heterologue is a topic which you might be able to add a few examples to.

Tabletop 05:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

U Bahn München

Ja das war der Plan. User:Agathoclea/UBahn ist meine Arbeitsliste. Agathoclea 09:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Auf [1] steht etwas von der alten U5. Hast Du auch ein Anfangsdatum, und eine Quellenangabe? Ebenso kann ich nichts von der Auflösung der U7/8 finden. Agathoclea 15:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Habe ich sonst noch Schreibfehler auf meiner Arbeitsliste? Agathoclea 22:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank nochmal. Habe jetzt fast alle Bahnhöfe ge-stubed, fange bald an sie auszufleischen. Agathoclea 22:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schön dich hier wieder zu sehen. Agathoclea 10:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

München Berduxstrasse railway station

This has been debated before. English speakers have a problem with 'ß' and tend to pronounce it as a 'B' so it is worth changing. On the other hand umlauts tend to be ignored. To anglicise it fully it should be retitled to 'Munich Berduxstrasse', but so far I have resisted the temptation to make such a sweeping change as there are so many stations with 'München' in the title. Hope that makes some sense. Bermicourt (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

U-Bahn at WP:DPL

Hi, I reverted your edit; that page is a list of disambiguation pages with inbound links that ought to be re-linked to a better destination. U-Bahn is indeed a dab page, and it does have inbound links that should go elsewhere, to the appropriate destination. Please let me know if I've misinterpreted your edit, or if there is other information to consider. Thanks! --AndrewHowse (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you want. I reverted a number of well-intended anti-disambiguation edits before that where the link should actually go to U-Bahn as an overview. If you think it is necessary, I want to any re-reverts. --FloSch (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I was hoping to find some content similar to S-Bahn; the best I could find was at Rapid transit in Germany#U-Bahn and I've been using that for generic U-Bahn descriptions. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 23:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2009-0713-NYA-CH.jpg

Hi there. I admit I don't know the history of the newer building above, but this building was the older City Hall, as listed in the National Register of Historic Places (and at the time was being marketed as a very unique live/work house). I initially swung through on a tour of Western exurbs to try and snap photos of NRHP-listed places, but I opted to also take photos of local Town Halls/City Halls and other key civic building when the opportunity presented itself. However, if you look at the largest resolution of the photo on Commons, you can see the building houses "City Offices" and, at the time, I used my iPhone to look up the city website and noticed they had a photo of the building for their "City Departments" page and the only other address given was a PO Box. I'd noticed a lot of smaller towns had shifted to that kind of combo-building so I thought it was a safe assumption. Interestingly enough, in trying to recheck my work on that photo, I found this recent article about the old City Hall on the Star-Tribune website. Maybe I'll get around to making an article for that NRHP building now... All the best! --Bobak (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FloSch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]