User talk:Flowdynamics

Spam in Flow dynamics

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Flow dynamics, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Flow dynamics is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Flow dynamics, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 05:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flow Dynamics

Conflict of interest

Please note that Wikipedia *strongly* discourages editors from creating or editing articles about themselves or organisations with which they have a close connection. This is because edits may be promotional or agenda-driven and not present a neutral point of view. Please refrain from editing Flow Dynamics further and instead discuss changes on the talk page with neutral editors.

OK. My apologies. I did not actually read the guidelines about contributing to wikipedia content until now (yes I am a goose). I was not actually aware of the rules about self-contributing articles. Sorry. I know pleading lack of knowledge is not an excuse, but I was not trying to skew the wikipedia content. No more edits from me.

Sources

Wikipedia required that articles are sourced from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy; see WP:V. The article is currently completely unsourced in this way. If what is written cannot be verified by reliable sources that are *independent of the subject*, the article is more likely to be considered for deletion, per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. If you know of any such sources, please list them on the talk page.

--Malcolmxl5 14:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some published sources that may help with this article include www.discogs.com for the discography

Music Review: Knowledge Mag (UK ) "Flow Dynamics is Australian Dave McKinney and all the sunshine down under certainly seems to be rubbing off in his music. "Live In The Mix" is upbeat dancefloor funk that keeps authentic funk touches while adding more electronic elements, like filters to give it a fresh edge. The record plays out exactly as you would expect and will satisfy any hard to please dancefloor’s appetite. On the flip ‘Heavy funk’ does exactly what it says on the cover. Slower drums and keys, and big horn sections make this a tidy groove" - Sean Bronsan, Knowledge Magazine

Music Review: DJ Magazine (UK) "A second single this month from the Rhibosome camp with founding member Dave McKinney laying down some more live-meets-electronic dancefloor funk. "Live In The Mix" is James Brown with flutes for Aussie hip hop heads. while "Heavy Funk" is just that: scratchy contemporary funk with real horns and punchy drums aplenty. Most tasty" - Matt Anniss, DJ Magazine

Music REview: XLR8R Magazine US

There is also a review of Flow DYnamics in XLR8R Magazine. Review by Toph One, Lucky 13 Column, XLR8R Issue 111, October 2007.

Some additional online reviews are here: http://www.inthemix.com.au/music/33132/Flow_Dynamics_Flow_Dynamics

http://www.straightup.com.au/page?n=906

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a few moments to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flow Dynamics for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Flow Dynamics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow Dynamics until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]