User talk:Forever Kenny

Image:Rihanna_Latest.png

Was this image scanned? From where?Kww (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No It was not!

What sort of job do you have that allows you access to celebrities in order to photograph them?Kww (talk) 03:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's pictures I find on a website. Then I make the picture out of a graphic, I just think my picture look better than the current one. And the one I recently had was not a scan, and I'm putting it back!

That's what I thought. Thanks for being honest and admitting it. That violates WP:IUP. I'll take care of having the image deleted for you. If you continue to download pictures from websites and upload them to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. If you continue to insert copyrighted images into Wikipedia articles like Rihanna, you will get blocked. Please take the time to read WP:IUP, and please comply with it. If you have any questions about what it means, then please feel free to ask. We're always glad to have editors, but copyright violations are not tolerated.Kww (talk) 03:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How am I violating something, when it is entirely my own work!

You are basing your work on an image that you downloaded from a website that you found. That makes it a derivative work. The owner of the original picture keeps his copyright. You have a copyright on whatever changes you made, but the owner of the original picture maintains his copyright as well. Basically, you cannot download pictures from websites and upload them to Wikipedia, and you can't download pictures from websites, change them, and then upload the changed picture, either.Kww (talk) 04:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures I took are from a webiste with no copyright. They made a statement officially allowing the pictures they have for free use. What does it matter anyway I really don't care, I'm just a teen wanting to become a graphic designer. Who knew people was this CRAZY.

If they actually own the pictures, there are ways to do what you want to do. What's the site? I'll look at it, and I'll help you if I can.Kww (talk) 22:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate-Rihanna.com

I don't see that they guarantee that they have ownership. The closest I can find is a statement that says No copyright infringement intended. They allow fans to upload images, and they allow fans to download images, but I don't see that they verify that the fans own the images that they upload. Is there a stronger statement somewhere that you know about?

Also, it would make things a little easier if you ended your comment on talk pages with ~~~~. That way, your comments will get signed and dated. It makes it easier to sort out what you say from what I say.Kww (talk) 03:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not sure, Like I said I'm just a teen.Forever Kenny (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with being a teen, or wanting to be a graphic designer, either. My daughter was a teen, and is getting her Masters in graphic design this year. I know that we seem very picky about copyrights, but it is important. Think: when you are trying to make a living as a graphic designer, won't you want people to pay you for your work? The same policies that keep you from borrowing other peoples photos without paying for them are the same policies that will help make sure that people pay you for your work.Kww (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So before I upload the pictures I design Give the person credit. But to whom?Forever Kenny (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this comment, so I didn't answer it before. Sorry. You have to get his permission, in writing, before you upload the image. It isn't enought to give him credit. You have to get written permission. I've undone your edits again.Kww (talk) 04:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well okForever Kenny (talk)

Can you please change the picture to a more recent one Forever Kenny (talk)

No one with a more recent picture has ever given us permission.Kww (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Normal liveyourlife2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Normal liveyourlife2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 00:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rehab.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rehab.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rihanna Rehab.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rihanna Rehab.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenneth Motley

A tag has been placed on Kenneth Motley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Zoo Fari 04:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary

In regards this; please do not attack other editors. Comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 06:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jay wethistown.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jay wethistown.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 22:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]