User talk:Foreverlove77

I am a new user and blocked. I hope this works.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Foreverlove77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

74.220.203.56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

sock of User:Rodentofdeath

Blocking administrator: Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Declined until blocking admin has a chance to check into your one edit. The evidence looks pretty compelling for you being the same person. As said below, if you are the same person as RodentofDeath, you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia, under any screenname, until the one year block has expired; otherwise you may face an indefinite block. — The Evil Spartan (talk) 11:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rodentofdeath (talk · contribs) does not exist.
Aha - it's RodentofDeath (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who has been banned for a year. If you are the same person, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia under any username (nor without one); please look here for your options in contesting your ban. I have never had any opportunity to deal with the user, so I can't judge either way. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse decline. The timing of the first edits and account creation makes it highly likely that this is indeed Rodentofdeath, trying to create a sleeper sock. Blocking indef. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: This has been confirmed by checkuser. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not any other person but this is a waste of my time.Foreverlove77 (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]