User talk:Formosa's storyteller

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:14, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Formosa's storyteller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't contributed anything yet! How did you know I'm clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia?

Accept reason:

Please accept my sincere apologies; it appears that I mixed things up and accidentally blocked you after mistakenly thinking that you created a user page that was disruptive (instead of someone else). I'm unblocking your account right now... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Bald moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Brother Bald, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 16:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Request for joint effort for building draft:Brother_Bald

Sorry. I will not join you about building draft:Brother_Bald.--Wolfch (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the Sockpuppet

I think maybe you are a sockpuppet of it's gonna be awesome. According to the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/It's gonna be awesome/Archive, what I think is true.

Please stop using sockpuppets because you have been blocked for such manner. Thanks --Wolfch (talk) 03:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Formosa's storyteller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/It's_gonna_be_awesome/Archive: All users show interest in articles like North-South divide in Taiwan. Most of the edit from Formosa's_storyteller is in North-South divide in Taiwan.-User:Wolfch **Editing North-South divide in Taiwan doesn't mean editors are directed by any person. Wikipedia is not a place for conspiracy theorists! **I didn't know User:Wolfch until he/she showed disruptive behaviors in Talk:North–South_divide_in_Taiwan#Explanation_request. Through his/her use of English, I assumed he/she has some knowledge in Chinese; thus, I invited Wolch to collaborate in writing a biography of a Taiwanese. It's just that simple. **I checked Wolfch's contribution history since he/she believed themselves is not an active user on English Wikipedia. But I noticed Wolfch developed an interest to track It's gonna be awesome's edits; however, Wolfch's subsequent edits were seldom deemed to be constructive, which I presume constituting Wikipedia:Harassment. Finally, it's quite conspicuous to learn that Wolfch is WP:Not here to contribute but trolling and fishing. My suggestion to Wolfch is "don't mistaken any those contributing to north-south divide in Taiwan to be any person." This can be annoying and causing unnecessary burdens to the community. --Formosa's storyteller (talk) 13:31, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/It's gonna be awesome/Archive. Yamla (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Juat had a glance on some related rules. I believe this check didn't abide by Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry and Wikipedia:CheckUser. I am not blind. it's not based on technical evidence. @Wolfch: I don't know who you're but I feel like you're somehow here to build an environment or something like that to make it look like what it seems like in your favor. Anyway, there's no rush. I will find time to read those complicated rules and prove those users are innocent. --Formosa's storyteller (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If Formosa's storyteller doesn't know me, it is quite strange to invite a wikipedian like me to writing a biography of a Taiwanese in English Wikipedia. Maybe I have no idea about this person. maybe my thought is different from Formosa's storyteller's thought in that article, (Actually, our thought are different in North–South divide in Taiwan)--Wolfch (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfch: I explained above. I didn't know User:Wolfch until he/she showed disruptive behaviors in Talk:North–South_divide_in_Taiwan#Explanation_request. Through his/her use of English, I assumed he/she has some knowledge in Chinese; thus, I invited Wolch to collaborate in writing a biography of a Taiwanese. It's just that simple. Do you have any issue with the explanation? --Formosa's storyteller (talk) 16:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make sense to me. I seldom invite other unfamiliar wikipedians to collaborate just because maybe he/she has some knowledge in that field. I will ask some question which I don't know, but not to colloborate. And you said I have some "disruptive behaviors". It is why I feel strange about your behavior (invite me). --Wolfch (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfch: I seldom invite other unfamiliar Wikipedians to collaborate... I don't agree with you. We're not here to make friends but writing encyclopediac articles. Wikipedia:Introduction]: Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by the people who use it. You showed disruptive behaviors on an article doesn't mean you're not competent at others, especially when you're just invited to contribute to a draft (See: User_talk:Wolfch#Request_for_joint_effort_for_building_draft:Brother_Bald). It feels like to me that you're here to monitor rather than contribution. How come? --Formosa's storyteller (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just kindly reminding your of Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought since you tended to make Wikipedia like your own Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the opinions of experts). Although Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of such knowledge. In the unusual situation where the opinions of an individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. (Personal essays on Wikipedia-related topics are welcome in your user namespace or on the Meta-wiki.)--Formosa's storyteller (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]