Jump to content

User talk:FrEvBrt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, FrEvBrt, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pisgah Legal Services, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pisgah Legal Services requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, FrEvBrt, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Here's a happy little kitten to brighten your day!

Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]

Hi! I saw that Equivamp marked the article on Queerness and rurality as being essay-like, so I thought that I would look over your work and give you some feedback.

The first thing that stood out was the lead. The lead serves as both an introduction to and summary of the article, however it differs greatly from the introductions that you see in papers and articles so it needs to be very to the point. Here's an example of how the first few sentences could be styled:

The relationship between queerness and rurality can vary depending on time, location, and culture. According to So-and-so, in popular depictions, rurality is often portrayed as an inherently incompatible, or even hostile, environment for individuals who are not heterosexual and/or cisgendered.

One of the reasons that it's important that the lead is styled a certain way is that it sets the tone for the article as a whole - if the style seems more like the introduction of a journal article then this can make other parts of the article feel like this as well or more greatly emphasize this issue. Getting used to writing in Wikipedia's style as opposed to the essay/journal article style that most of us have used all of our lives is something that takes just about every editor a while to get used to on here.

With the section "Rural/urban dichotomy and visibility politics in the United States", I noticed that parts of it are unsourced - all claims need to be backed up with an independent, reliable source. They should also be attributed to the person or organization that stated them, as otherwise they can run the risk of coming across as original thought or research. This is something that can be relatively easily solved by taking the sentence "Within this political framework, publicly claiming a minority sexual orientation is inherently political." and changing it to "In her 2009 book Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America, Mary Gray stated that within the political framework of the post-Stonewall era, publicly claiming a minority sexual orientation is seen as inherently political." The reason that it's so important to attribute is that some may challenge the statement and argue something different. This is something that can often happen with any controversial topic, so it's especially important to attribute in these situations.

I hope that this helps! Equivamp may come and give some feedback as well, so I thought that this would be a good start as far as feedback goes. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]