User talk:Frankenreiter

Welcome!

Hello, Frankenreiter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Pune did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add unsourced content. See WP:Verifiability, also history section requires WP:HISTRS compliant scholarly sources. Secondly, refrain from using WP:PUFFERY, for example the words in italics in the sentences - "XYZ was a creative administrator"; "vibrant city with elegant Wadas, beautiful..."; "British were well aware of the intelligence of shrewd" . Third, since you have been repeatedly trying to add unsourced content, it would be considered WP:Edit warring, so per WP:BRD policy, please discuss your changes in Talk:Pune supported by WP:HISTRS complaint sources so as to reach a WP:CONSENSUS. Hope you understand. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure ! Does a scholarly lecture video by academically established historians count as a scholarly source to cite ? How could I cite it ? Frankenreiter (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hi Frankenreiter! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ram Mandir that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Herald ! Sorry for the mismarking as I was trying to cite a link for the arguements of historians on the issue, and published it several times in the process. I'll resource it. Frankenreiter (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also make sure you use the correct syntax for adding references. Refer to how to cite your sources for more, rather than adding bare links. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: TOI is not a reliable sources per WP:TOI. So please use other reliable sources. You may use WP:RSP for the list of reliable sources. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]