User talk:Frankizoied

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 04:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To request an unblock, please use this account for this talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you’ll prolly refuse but:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frankizoied (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it’s not block evasion when the blocker connects the account to someone blocked over a decade ago and my closing of afds hardly undermines the process since they often get closed by another editor with the same result. It’s impossible to keep just one account when people like you make assumptions without clear cut proof. You may have downloaded the check user app, but the results are hardly accurate and rarely tell the person if the ip is public or not

Decline reason:

There is no time limit on block evasion. Please request unblocking via your original, blocked ten years ago account. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

socking

Your socking is much more recent than ten years ago. Just sayin' -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frankizoied (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Deepfriedokra and PhilKnight:I think it’s more that you don’t want me eating to edit and you’re just using an old blocked account to edit war. If you’re not happy that I’m editing that’s your problem not mine. Frankizoied (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC) :That makes no sense. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC) Yeah, especially when someone told you that any new account a “sock” of this person and you started believing them despite lack of any proof. Maybe you ought to forget this guy and focus on making sure the content of Wikipedia is accurate and properly sourced Frankizoied (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.