User talk:FranklinG/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

AfD nomination of Quebre As Correntes

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Quebre As Correntes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebre As Correntes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not include charts from hot100brasil.com, or any other charts listed at WP:BADCHARTS, in any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 13:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Quebre As Correntes ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You must not add the Hot 100 Brasil, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Reinserting it after it has been explained is inexcusable.—Kww(talk) 05:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Portals

Hi, Franklin... What's the problem here with you and Buzz? He's only trying to help you out. You have a few portals you've created, whereas he has many! You two can work better together rather than start an edit war. Buzz can teach you some things you've been missing in your portals concerning the codes. Please let him! Concerning future portal projects, the two of you can be a great team! Yes you can! Work with each other, not against one another. Okay. Best, --Discographer (talk) 12:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of O Rio, A Cidade, A Árvore

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is O Rio, A Cidade, A Árvore. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Rio, A Cidade, A Árvore. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

recycling keep arguments

a lot of people have noted you have recycled keep arguments without at all explaining how a musical article meets WP:NALBUMS or WP:NSONGS. LibStar (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of O Outro Lado Da Porta

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is O Outro Lado Da Porta. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Outro Lado Da Porta. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MTV Ao Vivo 5 Bandas de Rock (DVD).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MTV Ao Vivo 5 Bandas de Rock (DVD).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:O Acaso do Erro.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:O Acaso do Erro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of O Outro Lado Da Porta

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is O Outro Lado Da Porta. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Outro Lado Da Porta (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Good Girl Gone Bad photo series

Hello,
I've just deleted your uploaded Good Girl Gone Bad photo series, e.g. File:The Good Girl Gone Bad 1.jpg. You claimed on each image description that you had created the image "entirely by yourself", while actually they could all be found throughout the web for several years, which makes this claim doubtful.
If you really do own copyright, then we'll need to jump through some additional hoops to prove it. If you have any other questions about this, feel free to ask, I'll keep your page watchlisted for a bit. But judging by your upload log, you really need to be more careful with image uploads in the future.
Amalthea 08:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)