User talk:Freedamordistat

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Lesbian sexual practices shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not so much that this user edit warred; it's that he (I'm sure that this user is male) committed vandalism. Look at these edits.[1][2] It's clear, absurd vandalism, even with their being a little truth to some lesbians wondering if what they do sexually counts as "real sex" because no penis is involved. Besides that, the section is a behavior section, not a psychology/mental processes section. I will report this user if he does it again, right after I revert him. Unless you or someone else revert and report him first. 23.20.10.162 (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent report. Thanks. -- Brangifer (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For others, here are the diffs showing Freedamordistat being reported and the decision to block him.[3][4] 23.20.10.162 (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freedamordistat for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Eeekster (talk) 07:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]