User talk:FreemanSA

Edit warring[edit]

Hi FreemansSA. It looks like you're having a dispute with a variety of different users about what content belongs in Khamis Gaddafi. When that happens, Wikipedia requires that editors attempt to work our their differences through discussion, not just through continually reverting each other. In fact, our policy says that any editor who is edit warring--that is, reverting regularly without consensus--can be blocked from editing. Exactly what qualifies as edit-warring is somewhat subjective, but you're definitely crossing the line. More importantly, in this case, there is a very specific, unbreakable rule, called WP:3RR. This rule says that except in very rare circumstances that don't apply here, you cannot undo the changes of another editor more than 3 times in 24 hours (note that this isn't just hitting the "undo" button--it refers to any edit you make that reverts or undoes the work of another editor, even if you do it by hand). If you do, you will definitely be blocked temporarily. You've actually already reverted on that article 4 times in 24 hours, but since you weren't explicitly warned, I'm not going to block you. However, if you do revert again, I will do so. At this point, you have to go to Talk:Khamis Gaddafi and try to gain consensus for your desired changes. If you cannot, there are a series of steps called our dispute resolution process that you can follow; note, though, that decisions are ultimately based on Wikipedia policies, like WP:NPOV and WP:RS, not based on our own opinions about what is "true" or "good". Qwyrxian (talk) 00:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Objectively is the one who started to revert and has done way more than 3 reversion therefore you should warn him and not me because he is crying. --FreemanSA (talk) 12:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FreemanSA for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]