User talk:Fthorpe

This is Fthorpe's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lull (company) (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Simply too soon given they are only about a year-old thus too soon for established notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lull (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lull Page

It seems as though the wikipedia page I submitted earlier, demonstrating the significance of Lull mattress company was denied, because it is too new of a company. I fail to see how this is weigh's against the publishing of the page, resulting in the page being denied publishing rights. As a free Encyclopedia, I would think it necessary that the Wikipedia editorial team see the importance of publishing established companies whether they are 6 months to 10 years old. I find it unreasonable that a page not be published due to the time limits of a company's establishment. There are wiki pages published daily following current political scandals and environmental disasters. Not allowing the Lull company page to be published refutes the idea that Lull company exists. Finally, publishing Lull as the company that it is through the Wikipedia encyclopedia, simply recognizes the company as a standing and working association. Fthorpe (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Frankie Thorpe 06.03.16Fthorpe (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lull (company)

Hello, Fthorpe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Lull".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]