User talk:FuadEfendi

Spam in Tokenizer

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tokenizer, by EdJohnston (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tokenizer is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tokenizer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Tokenizer itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied

I replied. Sancho 18:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page in its current state should be deleted on sight for lacking an assertion of notability. Do you have any sources to establish notability? See the article's talk page for further discussion. Sancho 18:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Liferay

We do have a standards on what encyclopedic content is, in terms of whether it is significant or important (notable) enough to warrant an article. As for using Windows Vista as an example in my comments, I deliberately picked something that I know had an abundance of indepent reliable sources about it--articles in PC magazines, general tech magazines, Wired, etc.

Liferay has an article now, and I notice it does use independent sources. While they aren't the absolute rule in determining notability, they're a good barometer. (Conversely, without independent sources, we may not be able to verify the content of the article.)

As for stricter rules, there are attempts at it--e.g., the rules for biographies--but even with them, we fall back to the basic notability rules a lot. Plus, it would be hard to write rules to cover all the various areas. —C.Fred (talk) 22:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a sample, Windows Vista and "indepent reliable sources about it--articles in PC magazines, general tech magazines, Wired, etc."

- Indeed, all those sources are dependent on outdated and dead Windows 3.10, Windows. 3.11, Windows 95, etc. Windows Vista is just a product with own Time-to-Live... nothing is new with Windows. It's copyrighted and protected by thousands patents technology, and it is based on head and shoulders of giants such as George Boole and many others who never tried to limit their findings to special group of people (who pay money).

I provided sample with Potato - this is the best sample on what should be published here. We don't need articles on separate page about Intel 8080, but perhaps it could be listed in an article on CPU...

Funtick (talk) 22:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Funtick. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Funtick~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

I changed my user name to FuadEfendi.

Thank you, Fuad Efendi Tokenizer Inc.