User talk:FuadEfendi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spam in Tokenizer[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tokenizer, by EdJohnston (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tokenizer is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tokenizer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Tokenizer itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied[edit]

I replied. Sancho 18:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page in its current state should be deleted on sight for lacking an assertion of notability. Do you have any sources to establish notability? See the article's talk page for further discussion. Sancho 18:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Liferay[edit]

We do have a standards on what encyclopedic content is, in terms of whether it is significant or important (notable) enough to warrant an article. As for using Windows Vista as an example in my comments, I deliberately picked something that I know had an abundance of indepent reliable sources about it--articles in PC magazines, general tech magazines, Wired, etc.

Liferay has an article now, and I notice it does use independent sources. While they aren't the absolute rule in determining notability, they're a good barometer. (Conversely, without independent sources, we may not be able to verify the content of the article.)

As for stricter rules, there are attempts at it--e.g., the rules for biographies--but even with them, we fall back to the basic notability rules a lot. Plus, it would be hard to write rules to cover all the various areas. —C.Fred (talk) 22:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a sample, Windows Vista and "indepent reliable sources about it--articles in PC magazines, general tech magazines, Wired, etc."
- Indeed, all those sources are dependent on outdated and dead Windows 3.10, Windows. 3.11, Windows 95, etc. Windows Vista is just a product with own Time-to-Live... nothing is new with Windows. It's copyrighted and protected by thousands patents technology, and it is based on head and shoulders of giants such as George Boole and many others who never tried to limit their findings to special group of people (who pay money).
I provided sample with Potato - this is the best sample on what should be published here. We don't need articles on separate page about Intel 8080, but perhaps it could be listed in an article on CPU...

Funtick (talk) 22:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

00:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

I changed my user name to FuadEfendi.

Thank you, Fuad Efendi Tokenizer Inc.