User talk:G2080had

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, G2080had. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Elias Neocleous & Co LLC, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have any COI with Elias Neocleous & Co LLC G2080had (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Cyprus Mail. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ——Serial 15:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk:Cinadon36 Pelase see the official page from Cyprus Bar Assosiasion ^[1]

I know everything about the Cyprus mail. That article is not true. That why i would like to change. G2080had (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to login

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.

April 2021

Hello, I'm Bluefist. I noticed that in this edit to Andreas Neocleous & Co, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bluefist ^talk 20:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Andreas_Neocleous_&_Co. This was your third speedy delete tag on this page. Other users have previously suspected a possible Conflict of Interest from you. This is your final warning, next time you edit this page unconstructively you will be reported to the admins. Bluefist ^talk 20:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the information you have been trying to add for the past few months.

Hello, I have added that information about Andreas Neocleous that you have been trying to add. From using Google Translate and reading the sources that have been used, Mr. Neocleous is not reported to be guilty of the crime of bribery, just his law firm. I have also edited the Cyprus Mail in an attempt to be more neutral in the way it is worded. I hope these edits are acceptable to you. I encourage you to learn more about Wikipedia and even ask for help if you need assistance writing a good article that follows all the policies and rules.

The warning above is still in effect, please only edit constructively to these articles, as it seems that you may have a conflict of interest. Your only edits are to these subjects, which makes it very suspicious. Feel free to reach out to me if you need any further assistance or clarifications of what I have done. Bluefist ^talk 21:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Cyprus Bar Assosiasion".}

[1] "Cyprus Bar Assosiasion".}

[1]