User talk:GERSH.D

This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(Fall_2021) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, GERSH.D, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have an overdue training assignment.[edit]

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have an overdue training assignment.[edit]

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCI Peer Review[edit]

Ameruosoa.edu (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC) At the beginning of the original article in introduces sex tourism in the Dominican Republic and its reputation among different cities and other races involvement. When the edit comes in, there is a bit of a rocky transition however all the information included was completely relevant to informing on what could and does happen in regards to how to women act, their standards, their statuses, how men react, etc. There was no bias present whatsoever and the content was written to purely inform the reader on what occurs in sex tourism in the Dominican Republic. The edited version had a very strong skill in writing neutral content which I personally enjoyed… However I feel as though If they included the dangers these women put themselves in- if there is any at all- it could be very intriguing and potentially add a sense of “balanced coverage” with some positives and negatives. Also, I’m not sure if the original article ends on an open sentence, but I think you should kind of add an ending in order to allow a consistent and coherent article for the reader. The sources you included all were cited properly and seemed reliable.[reply]

Thank you for the review I corrected most of the grammatical mistakes. In addition to implementing the choice, the women have to make the choice of whether they want to live in an apartment and within the bars and the challenges and advantages of both. Thank you. GERSH.D (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)GERSH.D[reply]

WCI Peer Review[edit]

For your references, you could use more resources and the ones presented seemed fine. I am not sure if this is the lead or just a body but so far its good. Look back at your writing for any errors in your writing. What's written so far is easy to understand. The content presented so far is neutral. There is no bias. 15:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC) mc824117