User talk:GW4psychic

Welcome[edit]

Hello, GW4psychic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! serioushat 07:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lithomancy[edit]

In regard to your work on the article about Lithomancy, please read Wikipedia's rules on editing with a conflict of interest, on the use of Wikipedia for advertising and promotion and on our requirements for all facts to be verifiable with reference to reliable sources. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — kwami (talk) 06:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm glad to see you feel disappointed in us rather than angry. I guess I was too paranoid. Nonetheless, your version of the article reads more like an advertisement for your book than an entry in an encyclopedia, and your book, being self published (I have a self published book too) is not considered an encyclopedic reference. But if you have any of the library references from your time in Europe you would like to share, those would be welcome. — kwami (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]