User talk:Gabriel Moginot

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Moginot[edit]

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Moginot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 18:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Gabriel Moginot. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Moginot[edit]

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Moginot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. -- Alexf⁴² 23:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your comments[edit]

You are attempting to use Wikipedia as a vehicle for your own self promotion and this is strictly prohibited by our policies here. Your pictures also appear to be under copyright for whatever publication they were taken from and so they will be deleted shortly from Commons. Stop creating articles for yourself or agencies you work for or you will be blocked. This is your only warning. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both your user page and the number of speedy deletion notices on this page for your persistent recreation of your own article are evidence enough of your habitual self promotion. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with New Madison Agency. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 23:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of an afd tag is vandalism. If you disagree with the nomination, discuss it on the linked page. Corvus cornix_talk 23:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding credits on the image on the article page that the image is on, is spam. You may include a photographer credit on the image's Image: page. Corvus cornix_talk 23:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for your account is being used solely for self-promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 23:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabriel Moginot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

damn ! i can't even give explainations before anything happens ! and it was unjustified acts, there is no good reasons !

Decline reason:

You were asked several times to stop, and it looks like you had at least two days to respond. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i never made advertising ! it looks like you are unable to understand the meaning of "sharing my work with a community", it is not making promotion on me. I also understand that you have the only definition of a "media" like a picture is supposed to be. Well, i think you are just unable to understand in fact, you know, stopping someone without giving explanation or good reason is the way used by people who are wrong.

All the best. Gabriel.