User talk:Garden Mixer

Message to all editors, if you are going to make changes, then HAVE YOUR SOURCES READY FOR INSPECTION! Garden Mixer (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Alalalalalalala(BOOM!)

I noticed that you posted a message to User:Alalalalalalala(BOOM!) on their userpage User:Alalalalalalala(BOOM!), not their talkpage User talk:Alalalalalalala(BOOM!). I've moved it to the talkpage for you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right, thanks, I clicked the wrong red link. --Garden Mixer (talk) 18:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Also, welcome. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, Garden Mixer. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and disruptive editing, as you did at University of Tampa. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Swarm... ^—X— 00:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|So you cannot revert more than three times? Now I am being told. There is a claim at some "edit warring for admins" article that we (that is I and Westkennedy) were so-called "warned" about edit-warring albeit after violating three-revert thing. Can someone atleast show me where I was warned? If that info was wrong, and I wasn't warned, I ask to be unblocked and note that one should not continue to assert his actions in disputed situations, a three-revert restriction exists on articles in any case, and that had I know this, my actions were certainly good enough for a block as I am receiving. I will demonstrate my "good faith" by leaving the university article I edit-warred on alone, and I now see that Westkeddeny's efforts were in fact, totally decent.}} Garden Mixer (talk) 13:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) If your ban were indefinite, I'd fully support your appeal but as it is just 36 hours with most of it gone at the time of my writing, it is probably best to serve it out and then concentrate harder with future editing. You now know about WP:3RR and are aware your original actions were not for the best, but in your situation I'd hang tight for a bit, then make a fresh start. As a non-admin, I have no power to lift the ban so you know. --FAT RAT (talk) 18:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]