User talk:Gattysandhu

Hi I am Gurinder Singh Sandhu Sethi. Ibelong to village Sethi-Kalan(now known as Sathiala). I saw many of the articles related to Punjab and culture and religion are incorrect. Please help me in removing the incorrect info.

Copyright policy

Your addition to Sethi Sikh Gotra has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the text is a cut and paste of this webpage, which appears to have been written by you. Other wikis cannot be used as reliable sources, and using your own work and research is not allowed per policy.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been notified of discretionary sanctions on caste articles. Please get consensus for the changes you would like made to such articles.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for the continued addition of unsourced and poorly sourced material as well as original research to caste articles despite notification of discretionary sanctions on said articles and a reminder of the sanctions. Continued disruption following the block may lead to increasing blocks and/or topic bans. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gattysandhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am new to wikipedia so i want to correct the info. but i have been blocked,please help me

Decline reason:

you clearly need some time in which to read about poorly sourced data and original research. Let me emphasize that if you try to correct data without quoting supporting references you will be blocked again, almost certainly for longer. You are blocked for only three days; use the time wisely. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: As you have been confirmed to have created multiple accounts to evade your block, I have extended the current block to two weeks.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Due to repeated and unabated socking during your block, it has now been adjusted to indefinite.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gattysandhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am very sorry for my wrong actions on wikipedia. i would not disregard the wikipedia rules and will edit only according to the wikipedia policies. i have read the wikipedia policies and rules to edit the articles. so i request you to please unblock me from editing. i will also not create any fake account. i am really very sorry. i have also read about poorly sourced data and original research and will always cite the sources

Decline reason:

Too soon after socking, I think standard offer could be taken here. Max Semenik (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gattysandhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me from editing. i have fully read wikipedia rules and policies and will never do such mistake again. it has been a long time that i have been blocked

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, the standard offer approach could be applicable to this case. PhilKnight (talk) 21:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.