User talk:Genobawt

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Remus Lupin. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dust Filter 07:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Peacent 07:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Genobawt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry I was trying to add another section so that I could write a paragraph on the subject. I did not intend to kill a section of the wiki article.

Decline reason:

This is not at all consistent with your actions. — Yamla 13:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit like this doesn't seem to me a productive attempt to "add another section". Peacent 09:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked the blocking admin to come by and have another look. --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 09:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genobawt's explanation that he was "trying to add another section" is not at all consistent with what was actually done: blanking a large block of primary article text, and apparently replacing it with a crucial plot spoiler from Book 7. --T-dot ( ^Talk/contribs ) 09:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]