User talk:Giobrixton

Welcome!

Hello, Giobrixton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! TDL (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Giobrixton. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article European Neighbourhood Policy, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. TDL (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using multiple accounts

Hello, Giobrixton, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. It looks like you are the same person as User:Nflamigni. TDL (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of details on the ENP to multiple articles

I don't believe all these details are necessary on so many articles. Adding a link to European Neighbourhood Policy is helpful, but people can click on the link if they want more information. It clutters articles with tangentially related material. TDL (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. As I have indicated in my edit summaries when reverting these editions, this one program hardly merits three or four paragraphs--practically the same paragraphs--in articles on every country involved, especially when the majority of that text goes off on a complete tangent that has nothing to do with the country the article is about. WP:OFFTOPIC applies. Repeated addition of this content is disruptive. Please stop, or at least discuss the matter with others and work out an understanding before proceeding. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Belarus. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Georgia (country).

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]