User talk:Gl0betr0tter00

Olavo de Carvalho

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Olavo de Carvalho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Coltsfan (talk) 21:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No vandalism from my part. I'm serious and all my contributions are sourced. You need to respect my space and allow me to make the dits and add the sources. Your intromission on my work is uncivil and unjustified. Please stop your disrespect. Gl0betr0tter00 (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing information that is already backed by WP:RS, the "sources" you putted there don't give a lot of backing to anything in the text and the article in the way you wrote is very poorly written. The content you added is bias, not supported by WP:RS and it contradicts a lot of independent sources. Coltsfan (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Olavo de Carvalho

You can use the talk page to express your opinion on the article. However you are removing content that is backed by reliable sources. Don't do that again, or you might be WP:BLOCKED. Again, if you want to discuss, use the article's talk page. Coltsfan (talk) 21:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Olavo de Carvalho, you may be blocked from editing. Coltsfan (talk) 22:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:Gl0betr0tter00. This is to let you know that I have blocked the Olavo de Carvalho page from editing because of your edit warring. You have been adding massive amounts of new material to the page and removing existing sourced material. You have done this over and over. It is disruptive. What you need to do is to go to the article's talk page, and discuss the changes you want to make and the sources you want to use, one idea at a time. You must justify your changes by citing Reliable Sources. I must warn you that if you resume your disruptive editing after the two-day article freeze is over, you will almost certainly be blocked from editing that article, and possibly from all editing. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden

Please do not use misleading edit summaries. Furthermore, you added a copyrighted photo and claimed it as your "own work". If you do something like that again, you can be expected to be blocked from editing. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]