User talk:Gmumma73

Welcome!

Hi Gmumma73! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Whisperjanes (talk) 07:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SB19

Hello, I'm Ed6767. Content you re-added to the SB19 page was removed as part of a cleanup to remove content that does not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and also to merge and article into the page. Please do not restore a previous version, and instead please help the cleanup by building on the new version. Thank you! Ed6767 (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the heads up and apologies for resorting to the reversion. Wanted to work on the new version but only had a little bit of time to review what had caused the issues. Should have waited until I had enough time to do it. Is there a way to stop the malicious edits? Gmumma73 (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SB19

Hello, Good Morning.

This is regarding the SB19, wiki page. I've seen that you reverted my edition which I've spent hours looking for sources and materials to make it really good and I believe that I followed the quality standards of Wikipedia. We can actually collaborate to make this page worthwhile, but please do not delete it unless it came directly from the moderators/editors of Wikipedia. and Nope, its not fan-based because it has sourced from different articles and newspapers.

Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiburcio3780 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for reverting your edits as I didn't have time to reconstruct based on the edits you added. I shall work with the current version you edited.

Also, I don't mean that your sources are fan-based but your writing style is from the point of view of a fan so it may come across as biased writing. The earlier entry was already flagged about this issue which is why all of us are attempting to revise it to maintain the standards required of a Wiki page.

I am a fan like you and I also spent hours checking and rechecking what I place in the Wiki when I edit.

Thank you. Gmumma73 (talk) 04:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ing users

I noticed you @/users in the form @Example, please use Example ({{u|Example}}) or @Example: ({{ping|Example}}), or one of the other variations of {{user}}, it helps users respond to your comments. Thanks ― Qwerfjkl|✉ 20:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will keep that in mind. I guess I've become so used to using the '@' symbol for tagging people in social media. Gmumma73 (talk) 10:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]