User talk:Gofté Moorish

June 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Char Bouba war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 15:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Precisely the warning is made for you it is you who persist in modifying my modification and revoking it without any reason whereas I brought sources to debate on the veracity of the source you must launch a topic on the chat discussion of the page but obviously you are not doing it, you are carrying out a vandalism. Cordially Gofté Moorish (talk) 15:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Char Bouba war. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 16:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78466

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]