User talk:Gomez1992

November 2020

Hello, I'm Hunter1471. I noticed that you recently removed content from Deebo Samuel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hun ter 00:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Darwin Thompson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Hun ter 01:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Darwin Thompson, you may be blocked from editing. Hun ter 01:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mecole Hardman. Hun ter 01:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gomez1992 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it being used only for vandalism Gomez1992 (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is correct. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 37738 declined

UTRS appeal #37738 has been declined.

Unblock requests which are blank, abusive, or nonsensical, or are not serious, will not be considered. Because it fell into one or more of these categories, your appeal has been closed with no action. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]