User talk:Gorillabreath5702
Gorillabreath5702 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that I have made some poor choices today and I would like to apologize for it. I realize that I have said some horrible things, made racist hate speech, and hurt plenty of innocent users and again I would like to apologize. If given the opportunity to be unblocked, I will apologize to all who were offended and then I will become a productive editor to this project, make insightful edits, revert vandalism, create new relevant articles, and I swear not to repeat my past disruptive behavior. Thanks
Decline reason:
The exact word-for-word similarity to Hunterkok's request is enough for me to decline this, and open an SPI. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gorillabreath5702 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Would another admin please review this request? I know that today I made some stupid edits ranging from vandalism to attacks to hate speech. I seriously regret it and I feel bad for it, so I would like to be unblocked so I can redeem myself and prove that I am worthy of a second chance. By doing so I will make constructive, meaningful edits, treat other users with civility and respect at all times, refrain from any and all hate speech, revert disruptive vandalism and report the offenders. I understand I have been blocked for violating many of Wikipedia's rules today so I would like to be unblocked so I can make good valid edits to help build an Encyclopedia. Also, any allegation of socking above by Daniel Case is not true because this is the only account I've ever used on this website and in that SPI case it was proven I was not a "sock" of this Hunterkok, who has created other socks. I may have been a vandal and racist but not a socker. I will make sure all my edits are within Wikipedia's guidelines and not to repeat my past disruptive behavior.
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence suggests otherwise. Please contact the ban appeals subcommittee for any further unblock requests. Nakon 05:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'm in a forgiving mood at the minute. I've unblocked several editors on an assumption of good faith in the last day or two, but racism, homophobia and personal attacks are not something to which I'm willing to turn a blind eye. Was there any particular reason for the multiple foul-mouthed screeds you left in your wake? What would you do if I unblocked you and let you bugger off in the hope that you wouldn't cause trouble? How would you make yourself somebody worth keeping around? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- I realize that I left some really rude remarks and I'd once again like to apologize for all of them. I will refrain from hate speech and personal attacks. I think I'd make a good contributor if you would please give me a second chance. I could make some great edits to articles from adding new information to correcting typos. I could revert vandalism and report the vandal(s). I would be very nice to my fellow editors and I will once again NOT repeat this behavior. --Gorillabreath5702 (talk) 02:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'd be very reluctant to take your word for it. It also seems you are operating more than one account, given the nearly identical wording and timing of User:Hunterkok's unblock request. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, this is my only account I've ever had and his timing was far later than mine. And please, let me have a second chance, I will redeem myself for my bad history and if unblocked I promise not to repeat the behavior. I am dying to let you know how serious I am. And even HJ Mitchell is agreeing that I should get a second chance if I correct my behavior (which I said I would and will). --Gorillabreath5702 (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'd be very reluctant to take your word for it. It also seems you are operating more than one account, given the nearly identical wording and timing of User:Hunterkok's unblock request. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- I realize that I left some really rude remarks and I'd once again like to apologize for all of them. I will refrain from hate speech and personal attacks. I think I'd make a good contributor if you would please give me a second chance. I could make some great edits to articles from adding new information to correcting typos. I could revert vandalism and report the vandal(s). I would be very nice to my fellow editors and I will once again NOT repeat this behavior. --Gorillabreath5702 (talk) 02:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)