User talk:Gospel veracity

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gospel veracity (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So if one of your chosen few is the vandal User:Smalljim. Block the person who reports them? Or should I say the vandal/vandal's friends can block the user? This is one of the reasons why Wikipedia is not a reliable source. This block is both punitive and retaliatory in violation of wikipedia policies. Jimmy Whales has been contacted. I suspect it won't be long before I am blocked from editing my own talk page. That would be par for the course.

Decline reason:

Clearly disruptive editing, this request is declined. Nakon 20:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that the right to vanish isn't extended to blocked disruptive editors. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 03:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]