User talk:Graham's Packed Lunch
September 2008
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Polistes, you may be blocked from editing. Deliberate insertion of neologisms into Wikipedia does constitute a violation; if you cannot supply a citation for the use of a term, it has no place in an encyclopedic reference such as Wikipedia. I have nearly every paper ever written about Polistes here in my office, and the term "encephemede" does not appear in any of them. Be advised also of Wikipedia's "three revert rule"; if you revert the article one more time, the matter will be passed along to an administrator, and you may be blocked without any further warnings. You will ALSO be reported for a violation of Wikipedia's policy against sockpuppetry, in that you are using multiple accounts to make your edits, a practice which is a serious enough violation that it could potentially get you banned indefinitely. Wikipedia does have official policies, and plenty of administrators willing to enforce them, and you are coming very close to crossing the line. Dyanega (talk) 00:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Might I just suggest, then, that you update your collection of papers on Polistes to include more recent articles and journals using the now-common "encephemede"? Graham's Packed Lunch (talk) 13:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to do so if any such recent papers existed. Given that I happen to know all of the world's authorities on the group, I'm pretty confident you're not going to be able to give any citations. Dyanega (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Might I venture that you suggest to the world's authorities a scheme to introduce the word "encephemede" into all forthcoming publications? Graham's Packed Lunch (talk) 16:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to do so if any such recent papers existed. Given that I happen to know all of the world's authorities on the group, I'm pretty confident you're not going to be able to give any citations. Dyanega (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Graham's Packed Lunch for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Snigbrook (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)